Drawing for TIGER AUTOMATION

USPTO serial 86710181

TIGER AUTOMATION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
COGAN, BRITTNEY LORRAINE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TIGER AUTOMATION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Pierre C. Van Rysselberghe

PIERRE C. VAN RYSSELBERGHE Kolisch Hartwell P C520 SW Yamhill StPortland, OR 97204-1335UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007automated material handling equipment, namely, programmable conveyors for use with radial arm saws, sliding panel saws, tube cutting saws, upcut saws, boring machines, punch presses, vertical routers, metal shears, horizontal mortisers, tenoners, drill bridges, chop saws; conveyor accessories for programmable conveyors, namely tables specially adapted to hold powered machinery, ledge stands, back fences, back rules, tilted saw bases, attachment bearing brackets, leg sets, saw supports, coated layers, control stands, line filters, pusher feet, gang stops, extended arms, pusher mitres, and spring buffersACTIVE—
009mitre gauges; interlock kits comprised of electrical switches and solenoid valves for sensing movement of a machine part; computer software for optimizing material processing from raw materials, namely for controlling operation of conveyors, and material cutting and boringACTIVE—
042consulting in the field of designing customized material handling equipment for customers, namely design of automated, programmable, conveyors, saws, and drills; designing of customized material handling equipment for customersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 30, 2019MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 30, 2019ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 23, 2019EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 22, 2019EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Feb 22, 2019AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Feb 18, 2019EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Feb 18, 2019EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 18, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Aug 16, 2018EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Aug 16, 2018EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Aug 16, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 23, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 21, 2018EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Feb 21, 2018EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Feb 21, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 31, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Aug 29, 2017EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Aug 29, 2017EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Aug 29, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 18, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 16, 2017EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 16, 2017EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 16, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 30, 2016NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 5, 2016NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jul 5, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 15, 2016NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jun 1, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 13, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 11, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 11, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 11, 2015GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 11, 2015GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 11, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 10, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 5, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance