USPTO serial 86710227
AZIVA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FINK, GINA M
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with AZIVA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joshua G. Gigger
JOSHUA G. GIGGER Stoel Rives Llp201 S Main St # 1Salt Lake City, UT 84111-2215UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Platform as a service (PAAS) and software as a service (SAAS) featuring computer software platforms for the provision of web-based access to applications and services through a web operating system or portal interface, for use by healthcare providers including medical practitioners, mental health practitioners, health and wellness practitioners, veterinary specialists, chiropractors, radiologists, technologists, referring physicians, hospital administration and support staff to remotely conduct online healthcare services and consultations, to control and manage the downloading and accessing of medical data, medical images, and electronic medical records, and to enable remote operation of healthcare practices; PAAS and SAAS featuring computer software platforms for the provision of web-based access to applications and services through a web operating system or portal interface for healthcare providers and patients to do live consultations, exchange personal health information and schedule appointments; PAAS and SAAS featuring computer software platforms for the provision of web-based access to applications and services through a web operating system or portal interface for healthcare providers, medical insurance providers and patients to exchange health insurance information, and for patients to access information, namely, health insurance claims and coverage information, payment information, prescription and pharmacy information, information on health and wellness and information on healthcare providers and locations; computer services, namely, hosting a secured access web portal that provides users the ability to access proprietary health care information, web-driven applications, telemedicine platforms, physician support services, e-commerce platforms, and collaboration and communication services; computer services, namely, providing a web-based software application for use in telemedicine services and remote monitoring of data indicative of the health or condition of an individual or group of individuals for medical diagnosis and treatment purposes | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 7, 2016 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 7, 2016 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 10, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 10, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 10, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 10, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 5, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 3, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |