USPTO serial 86710477
AGREEMENT EXPRESS SIMQ
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RICHARDS, SUSAN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with AGREEMENT EXPRESS SIMQ?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Vancouver, BC, CA
VANCOUVER, BC, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Melissa L. Heywood
MELISSA L. HEYWOOD Accupro Trademark Services LLP702 - 401 WEST GEORGIA STREETVANCOUVER, BC, V6B5A1CANADAGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Software in the field of document automation, namely, software used in conjunction with other software for the generation, control, management and processing of documents, including agreements, contracts and applications, for the purposes of managing and simplifying the tasks and duties between the users of the software and to provide secured access between the users of the software | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Providing online non-downloadable software in the field of document automation, namely, software used in conjunction with other software for the generation, control, management and processing of documents, including agreements, contracts and applications, for the purposes of managing and simplifying the tasks and duties between the users of the software and to provide secured access between the users of the software | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Recombo Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by AGREEMENT EXPRESS INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named AGREEMENT EXPRESS SIMQ
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 4, 2019 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 1, 2019 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 21, 2018 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 21, 2018 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 21, 2018 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 18, 2018 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 18, 2018 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 18, 2018 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 9, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 9, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 29, 2017 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 29, 2017 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 29, 2017 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 29, 2017 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 14, 2017 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 13, 2016 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 13, 2016 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 13, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 29, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 22, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 22, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 16, 2016 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 29, 2016 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 29, 2016 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 29, 2016 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 29, 2015 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 29, 2015 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 29, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 15, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 15, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 14, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 1, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 12, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 12, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 12, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 10, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 21, 2015 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Aug 6, 2015 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 5, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 3, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |