Drawing for ULTIMATE JACKPOT

USPTO serial 86711020

ULTIMATE JACKPOT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CHANG, KATHERINE S
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ULTIMATE JACKPOT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Steven Caloiaro

STEVEN CALOIARO Sekhon & O'Bryant18826 North Lower Sacramento Road, SuiteWoodbridge, CA 95258UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Interactive game programs; computer gaming software for gambling; computer gaming software for recreational game playing purposes; computer game programs downloadable via the Internet; interactive reel and slot game programsACTIVE—
041Entertainment, amusement and recreational services, namely, casino gaming and gambling services provided in a casino via gaming machines; entertainment services, namely, providing online electronic games; providing a web-based system and on-line portal for customers to participate in on-line gaming; operation and coordination of game tournaments, leagues and tours for gambling purposes; entertainment services, namely, providing temporary use of non-downloadable interactive computer gamesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 28, 2017MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Apr 28, 2017ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Apr 27, 2017EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Feb 24, 2017TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 24, 2017TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 28, 2016GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Oct 28, 2016GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 28, 2016CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 7, 2016XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Oct 7, 2016GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 7, 2016GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 7, 2016CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jun 28, 2016TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 8, 2016UNDCUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - COURTESY COPY MAILED—
Jun 3, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 3, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 3, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 14, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 13, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 13, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 13, 2015GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 13, 2015GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 13, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 9, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 5, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 4, 2015NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance