USPTO serial 86711140
FAMILY ER + URGENT CARE 24 HR EMERGENCY + URGENT CARE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ANDERSON, CASSONDRA CR
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FAMILY ER + URGENT CARE 24 HR EMERGENCY + URGENT CARE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David A. Bell
DAVID A. BELL Haynes and Boone Llp2323 Victory Ave Ste 700Dallas, TX 75219-7673UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 044 | Freestanding emergency and urgent care departments providing all levels of unscheduled medical care, providing a web site featuring medical information | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Premier One Emergency Centers, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Premier One Emergency Centers, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 044
- Similar marks named FAMILY ER + URGENT CARE 24 HR EMERGENCY + URGENT CARE
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 10, 2017 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 9, 2017 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 7, 2017 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 17, 2017 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 10, 2017 | CHPN | POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT – NOT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 12, 2016 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Dec 3, 2016 | EPPA | TEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 3, 2016 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 5, 2016 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 5, 2016 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 15, 2016 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 31, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 31, 2016 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 31, 2016 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 31, 2016 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 31, 2016 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 13, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 11, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 11, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 11, 2015 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Nov 11, 2015 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Nov 11, 2015 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Nov 9, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 6, 2015 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 5, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 4, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |