Drawing for THREATID

USPTO serial 86711175

THREATID

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HUDSON, TAMARA BREE
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THREATID?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Paul J. Sutton

PAUL J SUTTON SUTTON MAGIDOFF LLP315 MADISON AVE3RD FLOORNEW YORK, NY 10017

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009downloadable software that receives specific natural gas pipeline data, and analyzes, identifies and quantifies the probability of pipeline integrity weakness or failure, based upon incident dataACTIVEJan 31, 2015
042a service for analyzing, identifying and quantifying the probability of pipeline integrity weakness or failure, based upon incident data using a software-based system capable of receiving specific natural gas pipeline dataACTIVEJan 31, 2015

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 8, 2019MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Apr 23, 2019ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Apr 23, 2019EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Feb 13, 2019EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Nov 16, 2018EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Nov 16, 2018EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
May 16, 2018GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
May 16, 2018GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 16, 2018CNFRSU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 18, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 18, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 17, 2018ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 6, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 9, 2018DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 6, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 6, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 6, 2017CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 5, 2017SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Oct 4, 2017AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Sep 27, 2017IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Sep 27, 2017EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Mar 29, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 27, 2017EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Mar 27, 2017EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Mar 27, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 27, 2016NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 2, 2016NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Aug 2, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 13, 2016NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jun 24, 2016PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 17, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 1, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 1, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 24, 2016ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 11, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 11, 2016TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 14, 2015GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 14, 2015GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 14, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 12, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 6, 2015MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
Aug 5, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 4, 2015NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance