Drawing for LUCIDSOUND

USPTO serial 86711462

LUCIDSOUND

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BAKER, JORDAN A
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LUCIDSOUND?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Keith A. Kelly

KEITH A. KELLY Law Offices Of Keith A Kelly7095 Indiana Ave Ste 200Riverside, CA 92506-4160UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Headsets for use with computers; Music headphonesACTIVE—
028Audio and visual headsets for use in playing video games; Gaming headsets adapted for use in playing video gamesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 15, 2017MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 15, 2017ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 13, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Oct 11, 2016EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Oct 11, 2016EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Oct 11, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 12, 2016NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 16, 2016NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Feb 16, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 27, 2016NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Nov 19, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 19, 2015XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Nov 19, 2015GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Nov 19, 2015GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Nov 19, 2015CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Nov 19, 2015GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 19, 2015GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 19, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 12, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 7, 2015MDSMNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Aug 6, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 4, 2015NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance