Drawing for I-FLOW

USPTO serial 86712615

I-FLOW

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CRENNAN, KEVIN GERARD
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with I-FLOW?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Andrea E. Bates

ANDREA E. BATES Bates & Bates Llc1890 Marietta Blvd NWAtlanta, GA 30318-2803UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010Programmable medical infusion apparatus, namely, infuser sets comprised of catheters, injection needles, and elastomeric infusion pumps sold empty for infusion therapy, and I.V. sets comprised of catheters, injection needles, intravenous bags sold empty for intravenous therapy, and medical tubing except medical apparatus and equipment for use in the diagnosis and treatment of respiratory insufficiencies and allergies, and for applying substances to the lungs and respiratory tracACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 30, 2018MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 30, 2018ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 23, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Dec 21, 2017EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 21, 2017EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 21, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 27, 2017NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 14, 2017ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED—
Apr 23, 2017CHPBPOST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
Apr 20, 2017APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Apr 11, 2017EPPATEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Jan 31, 2017ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Jan 3, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jan 3, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 14, 2016NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Nov 29, 2016PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 28, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 2, 2016XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Nov 2, 2016GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Nov 2, 2016GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Nov 2, 2016CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Oct 25, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 25, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 20, 2016ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 9, 2016NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Oct 7, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 7, 2016PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Oct 7, 2016PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Sep 29, 2016MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 29, 2016ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 2, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 2, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 2, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 25, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 24, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 24, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 1, 2015GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 1, 2015GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 1, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 31, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 7, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 6, 2015NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance