USPTO serial 86714313
ROADMUNK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 18, 2019
- Examiner
- OH, WON TEAK
- Law office
- Historical data usage
What this means
Status 702 means the registration is active, Section 8 was accepted, and a Section 15 declaration of incontestability was also accepted. Incontestability strengthens your rights by limiting certain challenges after five years of continuous use. Continue use in commerce and plan for the 10-year Section 8 and 9 renewal.
Need help with ROADMUNK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Richard B. Biagi
Richard B. Biagi Neal & McDevitt, LLC2801 Lakeside Drive, Suite 201Bannockburn, IL 60015United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable computer software in the field of uploading, posting, displaying, editing, organizing, transmitting, sharing of product or project roadmaps, all of the above goods not in the fields of travel and expense management | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Software as a service (SaaS) services featuring software for uploading, posting, displaying, editing, organizing, transmitting, or managing product, business, project, or idea roadmaps, all of the above services not in the fields of travel and expense management; software as a service (SaaS) services featuring software for accessing, viewing, and managing product, business, project, or idea roadmaps, all of the above services not in the fields of travel and expense management; software as a service (SaaS) services, namely, hosting software for use by others to develop, manipulate, review, and manage product, business, project, or idea roadmaps, all of the above services not in the fields of travel and expense management; computer software consultation services, all of the above services not in the fields of travel and expense management; technical support services, namely, troubleshooting of computer software problems in the field of product, business, project, or idea roadmaps, all of the above services not in the fields of travel and expense management; software as a service (SaaS) services featuring software for creating, reviewing and managing product, business, project, or strategy roadmaps, all of the above services not in the fields of travel and expense management | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 21, 2025 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 20, 2025 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 20, 2025 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Oct 20, 2025 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 18, 2025 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 27, 2024 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 27, 2024 | ECDR | TEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS | — |
| Jun 27, 2024 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 27, 2024 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 27, 2024 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jun 27, 2024 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 18, 2024 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 18, 2019 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 2, 2019 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 2, 2019 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 13, 2019 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2019 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 7, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 7, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 1, 2019 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 3, 2019 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 19, 2018 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Sep 19, 2018 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 19, 2018 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 10, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 10, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 6, 2018 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 6, 2018 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Sep 6, 2018 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 8, 2018 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2018 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2018 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 20, 2018 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 14, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 3, 2017 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 3, 2017 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 3, 2017 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 22, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 21, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 21, 2017 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 21, 2017 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 21, 2017 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 21, 2017 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 13, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 13, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 12, 2017 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 23, 2016 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 23, 2016 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 23, 2016 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 22, 2016 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 15, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 1, 2016 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2016 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 17, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 16, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 16, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 23, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 23, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 23, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 16, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 11, 2015 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 8, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 7, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |