Drawing for COLORGANICS

USPTO serial 86714378

COLORGANICS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
JAGANNATHAN, SIDDHARTH
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with COLORGANICS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John J. O'Malley

JOHN J O'MALLEY VOLPE AND KOENIG PC30 S 17TH STSUITE 1800PHILADELPHIA, PA 19103-4005

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Organic hair products, namely, hair conditioners, hair shampoos, hair balsam, hair bleach, hair bleaches, hair care creams, hair care lotions, hair care preparations, hair color, hair colorants, hair curling preparations, hair decolorants, bleaching preparations for the hair, color-removing preparations for hair, cosmetic hair dressing preparations, hair oils, hair sprays and hair gels, hair straightening preparations, hair styling preparations, hair-washing powder, hair emollients, hair fixers, hair frosts, hair gel and hair mousse, hair glaze, hair lacquers, hair lighteners, hair mousse, adhesives for affixing false hairACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 29, 2018MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Oct 29, 2018ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Oct 29, 2018EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Aug 13, 2018EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
May 16, 2018GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
May 16, 2018GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
May 16, 2018CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Apr 10, 2018JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Dec 5, 2016EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Dec 5, 2016JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Dec 5, 2016EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jun 5, 2016GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jun 5, 2016GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 5, 2016CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 18, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 18, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 18, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 18, 2015GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 18, 2015GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 18, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 16, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 8, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 7, 2015NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance