USPTO serial 86714802
ZEEK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 605
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SCHRODY, ALLISON PAIGE
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ZEEK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Wilmington, DE
Wilmington, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kelly A. Donohue
KELLY A. DONOHUE Wilkinson Barker Knauer LLP1800 M Street NWSuite 800NWashington, DC 20036Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer application software for electronic devices, namely, software that enables the electronic transmission, broadcast, streaming and viewing of digital media content for entertainment purposes | ABANDONED | — |
| 035 | Online retail store services featuring a wide variety of electronic consumer goods of others | ABANDONED | — |
| 038 | Providing an electronic platform or portal to provide access to digital media content via cable television, satellite television, Internet protocol television (IPTV), the Internet, mobile networks, wireless networks, fiber-optic networks, and other electronic communications networks; electronic transmission and streaming of digital media content for others via cable television, satellite television, Internet protocol television (IPTV), the Internet, mobile networks, wireless networks, fiber-optic networks, and other electronic communications networks; video-on-demand transmission services; customizable video-on-demand transmission services; video broadcasting services; Internet broadcasting services; providing access to computer, electronic, and online databases; providing access to computer databases in the fields of social networking, business networking, and entertainment | ABANDONED | — |
| 041 | Entertainment services, namely, providing digital media content via cable television, satellite television, Internet protocol television (IPTV), the Internet, mobile networks, wireless networks, fiber-optic networks, and other electronic communications networks on a wide variety of topics and subjects; entertainment services, namely, providing digital media content to electronic devices on a wide variety of topics and subjects | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 27, 2016 | MAB5 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 27, 2016 | ABN5 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 14, 2016 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 28, 2016 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 28, 2016 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 28, 2016 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 8, 2016 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 24, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 24, 2016 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 24, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 16, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 4, 2016 | LOPR | LETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE REVIEWED-NO FURTHER ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Dec 28, 2015 | LOPT | LETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED | — |
| Nov 18, 2015 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 17, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 17, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 17, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 15, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 10, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 7, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |