USPTO serial 86715388
INPERMID
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BROOKSHIRE, DAVID AARON
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with INPERMID?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Eleanor M. Yost
ELEANOR M. YOST Goodwin Procter Llp901 New York Ave NWWashington, DC 20001-4432UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer programs, downloadable computer programs and mobile device software for computer systems and network access control featuring digital identity authentication, security management and security application auditing; Computer programs, downloadable computer programs and mobile device software for electronic transactions, for fraud detection, for capturing unauthorized activity, for monitoring behavior analytics, for providing detailed analytics, for permanent device identification, for root detection, for malware/crimewear detection, and for creating and managing an identity network; Computer programs, downloadable computer programs and mobile device software for analyzing website traffic, for detecting devices accessing a website, and for determining the geographic location of devices accessing a website | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Computer analytics services for detecting devices accessing a website, for determining the geographic location of devices accessing a website, and for assessing website traffic | ACTIVE | — |
| 045 | Computerized identification verification services, namely, providing authentication of identification information for network access control and security management; computerized identification verification services, namely, providing authentication for transactions and devices | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 9, 2017 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 9, 2017 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 11, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 11, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 11, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 24, 2016 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 18, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 18, 2015 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 18, 2015 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 18, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 18, 2015 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 18, 2015 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 18, 2015 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 18, 2015 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 17, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 11, 2015 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 8, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |