Drawing for PURESCIENCE

USPTO serial 86716051

PURESCIENCE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
EISNACH, MICHAEL PATRICK
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PURESCIENCE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kathryn Starshak

KATHRYN STARSHAK K&L GATES LLPPO BOX 1135CHICAGO, IL 60690-1135UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Insecticides and pesticides for use with production animals and production animal facilitiesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 1, 2017MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
May 1, 2017ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
May 1, 2017EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Mar 20, 2017EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Dec 8, 2016EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Dec 8, 2016EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jun 10, 2016GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jun 10, 2016GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 10, 2016CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 21, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 20, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 20, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 24, 2016ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 24, 2016REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Dec 3, 2015WOAGWITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED—
Dec 3, 2015WOARTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED—
Nov 24, 2015GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 24, 2015GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 24, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 20, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 16, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 12, 2015MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
Aug 11, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 8, 2015NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance