USPTO serial 86716331
SNAUWAERT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- COHEN, ROBERT ANDREW
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SNAUWAERT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
jerry choe
JERRY CHOE Jerry Choe Esq48 Jericho TpkeJericho, NY 11753-1004UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 018 | Bags for sports | ACTIVE | Jul 18, 1978 |
| 028 | (Based on Use in Commerce) Tennis racket covers; Tennis rackets; Tennis racquets; Tennis racquets, baseball bats, cricket bats, golf clubs and hockey sticks(Based on Intent to Use) Badminton racket strings; Badminton rackets; Badminton shuttlecocks; Bags specially adapted for padel rackets; Cases for tennis balls; Fitted protective covers specially adapted for sports equipment, namely, tennis squash badminton rackets; Grip tape for tennis squash platform or badminton rackets; Grip tapes for rackets; Gut for tennis rackets; Guts for rackets; Hand grips for tennis; Nets for badminton; Padel balls; Padel rackets; Protective covers for rackets; Racket balls; Racket cases; Racket grip tape; Rackets; Rackets and strings for rackets; Rackets for tennis, squash, platform, padel, racquetball, racketball; Racquet ball gloves; Racquet ball nets; Racquet ball racket covers; Racquet ball racket strings; Racquet ball rackets; Racquet balls; Shuttlecocks for badminton; Sports equipment, namely, telescoping caddy for bucket for carrying, storing and transporting tennis balls and other sports equipment; Sports equipment, namely, vibration dampeners for rackets; Squash balls; Squash racket covers; Squash racket strings; Squash rackets; Strings for rackets; Table tennis rackets; Tennis balls; Tennis racket presses; Tennis racket strings | ACTIVE | Jul 18, 1978 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 27, 2016 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 26, 2016 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 29, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 29, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 29, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 23, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 23, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 23, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 18, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 11, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 10, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |