Drawing for SAY IT LOUD! SCREAM IT PROUD!

USPTO serial 86716357

SAY IT LOUD! SCREAM IT PROUD!

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
PEREZ, STEVEN M
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SAY IT LOUD! SCREAM IT PROUD!?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Phillip Thomas Horton

736 WEST STATE STREETF301FARMINGTON, UT 84025

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025Polo shirts; Shorts; Sweatpants; Sweatshirts; T-shirtsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 10, 2018MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Sep 10, 2018ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Sep 10, 2018EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jun 26, 2018EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Apr 2, 2018GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 2, 2018GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 2, 2018CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Feb 7, 2018JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Dec 8, 2017EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Dec 8, 2017EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Dec 7, 2017ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 7, 2017REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jul 17, 2017WOAGWITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED—
Jul 17, 2017WOARTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED—
Jun 7, 2017GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jun 7, 2017GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 7, 2017CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 26, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 25, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 25, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 13, 2017WOAGWITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED—
Feb 13, 2017WOARTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED—
Oct 25, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 25, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 25, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 29, 2016RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Aug 25, 2016ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 9, 2016GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 9, 2016GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 9, 2016CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Feb 9, 2016ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Feb 9, 2016IUCNNOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED—
Feb 9, 2016NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 16, 2015JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Dec 15, 2015NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Dec 15, 2015PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 25, 2015NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Nov 11, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 3, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 11, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 10, 2015NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance