USPTO serial 86717543
TIAR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4962997Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 24, 2016
- Examiner
- VERHOSEK, WILLIAM T
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with TIAR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
west vancouver, CA
west vancouver, CA
west vancouver, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Saul Acherman
Saul Acherman Jafari Law Group18201 Von Karman AveIrvine, CA 92612UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | (Based on Use in Commerce) Canned fruits and vegetables; Cooked fruits and vegetables; Dried fruit and vegetables; Dry whey; Fermented vegetables (kimchi); Freeze-dried vegetables; Meat, fish, fruit and vegetable preserves; Meat, fruit and vegetable jellies, jams; Milk-based beverages containing milk concentrates, vegetable oil and added nutrients; Preserved fruit and vegetables; Processed vegetables, namely, cooked cucumber, daikon, mushrooms, bellflower root, spinach, soybean sprouts and bracken fern stems used in bibimbap dishes; Sliced vegetables; Vegetable chips; Vegetable juice for cooking; Vegetable paste; Vegetables in vinegar; (Based on 44(e)) Canned vegetables; Dried fruit and vegetables; Dry whey; Jams | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Aug 29, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 13, 2023 | NCS8 | NOTICE OF CANCELLATION SEC. 8 EMAILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2023 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Nov 16, 2022 | PUM2 | OFFICE ACTION ISSUED POU2 | — |
| Nov 14, 2022 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| May 12, 2022 | PUM1 | OFFICE ACTION ISSUED POU1 | — |
| May 11, 2022 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 28, 2022 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| May 24, 2021 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| May 24, 2016 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 8, 2016 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2016 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 17, 2016 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 1, 2016 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 28, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 26, 2016 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 26, 2016 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2016 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2016 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 19, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 19, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 19, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 11, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 11, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 4, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 11, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 18, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 18, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 18, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 17, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 12, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 10, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |