USPTO serial 86718020
CAPP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LAMONT, MIAH ROSENBERG
- Law office
- LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CAPP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jennifer D. Silverman
ATUL R SINGH ELLENOFF GROSSMAN & SCHOLE LLP1345 AVENUE OF THE AMERICAS11TH FLOORNEW YORK, NY 10105-0013Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Educational services, namely, providing seminars, courses, workshops, classes, conferences, and distributing course materials therewith, in the fields of positive psychology, personal improvement, self-fulfillment, personal growth and motivation, personal image development, interpersonal communication, and mind-body medicine; educational services, namely, providing online seminars, courses, workshops, classes, and conferences, and distributing course materials therewith, in the fields of positive psychology, personal improvement, self-fulfillment, personal growth and motivation, personal image development, interpersonal communication, and mind-body medicine; educational and entertainment services, namely, providing motivational speakers, and distributing course materials therewith, in the fields of positive psychology, personal improvement, self-fulfillment, personal growth and motivation, personal image development, interpersonal communication, and mind-body medicine; personal and professional coaching services, and distributing course materials therewith, in the fields of positive psychology, personal improvement, self-fulfillment, personal growth and motivation, personal image development, interpersonal communication, and mind-body medicine; Educational services, namely, providing training of practitioners for certification, and distributing course materials therewith, in the fields of positive psychology, personal improvement, self-fulfillment, personal growth and motivation, personal image development, interpersonal communication, and mind-body medicine | ACTIVE | Sep 30, 2012 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 26, 2017 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jul 25, 2017 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jul 25, 2017 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 13, 2017 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Nov 21, 2016 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 21, 2016 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 21, 2016 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 17, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 17, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 14, 2016 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 14, 2016 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 14, 2016 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 14, 2016 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 13, 2016 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| May 13, 2016 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 13, 2016 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 12, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 2, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 30, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 29, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 29, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 3, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 3, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 3, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 2, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 13, 2015 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 12, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 11, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |