Drawing for THINCLST

USPTO serial 86718074

THINCLST

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CORWIN, KEVIN SCOTT
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THINCLST?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

GARY D. KRUGMAN

GARY D. KRUGMAN Sughrue Mion Pllc2100 Pennsylvania Ave NWWashington, DC 20037-3202UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009computer software which converts computers into thin client computersACTIVE—
042Computer rental; rental of computer software; computer programming; computer software design; consultancy in the field of computer hardware selection and implementation; consultancy in the field of computer software; maintenance of computer software; installation of computer software; customized design of computer hardware and software; remote computer backup services; computer software setup services; computer hardware monitoring services, namely, monitoring malfunction and security logs and reporting statusACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 10, 2017MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 9, 2017ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 7, 2017NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 17, 2017ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED—
Nov 15, 2016CHPBPOST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
Nov 15, 2016APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Oct 25, 2016EPPATEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Aug 1, 2016ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Jul 5, 2016NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jul 5, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 15, 2016NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
May 27, 2016PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 20, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 9, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 26, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 25, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 25, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 19, 2015GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 19, 2015GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 19, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 19, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 4, 2015AMPXPRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
Sep 1, 2015ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 17, 2015PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Aug 12, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 11, 2015NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance