Drawing for DIP CLIP

USPTO serial 86718500

DIP CLIP

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SNYDER, NELSON B
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DIP CLIP?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kristine M. Boylan

KRISTINE M BOYLAN BRIGGS AND MORGAN PA2200 IDS CENTER 80 SOUTH 8TH STREETMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
038broadcasting, streaming, and transmission of audio-visual media content in the field of applying coatings, sealants and adhesivesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 23, 2017EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jan 19, 2017MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jan 19, 2017ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jan 19, 2017EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jan 19, 2017EXDMEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED AS MOOT—
Nov 14, 2016RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED—
Nov 14, 2016CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Nov 7, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 7, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 1, 2016ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 21, 2016ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Oct 21, 2016EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Oct 21, 2016JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Oct 21, 2016EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Apr 21, 2016CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 20, 2016CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 30, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 29, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 29, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 29, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 28, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 28, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 13, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 11, 2015NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance