CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for DYNOVALVE

USPTO serial 86720143

DYNOVALVE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CRENNAN, KEVIN GERARD
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DYNOVALVE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Scott W. Kelley

SCOTT W. KELLEY Kelly & Kelley Llp6320 Canoga Ave Ste 1650Woodland Hills, CA 91367-7704UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016Ball pens; Ball point pens; Coloured pens; Paper banners; PencilsACTIVE—
020Plastic banners; Vinyl bannersACTIVE—
021Coffee cups, tea cups and mugs; Cups; Drinking cups and saucers; Drinking glasses; Mugs; SaucersACTIVE—
025Belts for clothing; Caps; Dresses; Gloves; Hats; Jackets; Pants; Shirts; Shoes; Skirts; Socks; Sweat shirts; T-shirtsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 2, 2017MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 2, 2017ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 11, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 9, 2017EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jan 9, 2017EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jan 9, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 13, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jul 11, 2016EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jul 11, 2016EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jul 11, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 1, 2016NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 5, 2016NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jan 5, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 16, 2015NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Dec 1, 2015PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 23, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 17, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 17, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 10, 2015ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 21, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 1, 2015GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Oct 1, 2015GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Oct 1, 2015CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Sep 24, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 14, 2015MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
Aug 13, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 13, 2015NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance