USPTO serial 86720181
FOODECINE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SABAGH, LAILA TAREK
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 127 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with FOODECINE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Richard H Newman
RICHARD H NEWMAN NEWMAN LAW7435 S EASTERN AVE STE 105-431LAS VEGAS, NV 89123-1507UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Cosmetic preparations; Cosmetic preparations for skin care; Non-medicated skin care creams and lotions; Non-medicated skin care preparations | ACTIVE | — |
| 005 | Medicated skin care preparations; Nutraceuticals for the treatment of cardiovascular disease, developmental diseases, brain health, vascular diseases, cancers, immunological diseases, and inflammatory diseases; Nutraceuticals for use as a dietary supplement; Nutritional supplements; Nutritional supplements in lotion form sold as a component of nutritional skin care products | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Education services, namely, providing on-line cognitive assessments, training programs and computer games in the field of brain health, diseases of brain development and degeneration; Education services, namely, providing online cognitive assessments and training programs that help identify cognitive strengths and weaknesses of an individual; Entertainment services, namely, providing online computer games that help maintain an active brain and thus improve memory, speed of processing, and that provide a variety of cognitive benefits that positively impact quality of life | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 11, 2019 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 11, 2019 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 1, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 5, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 5, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 5, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 5, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 11, 2018 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 9, 2018 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 9, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 26, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 24, 2017 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 13, 2017 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 1, 2016 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 31, 2016 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 25, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 5, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 23, 2015 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 23, 2015 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 23, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 23, 2015 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 23, 2015 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 23, 2015 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 23, 2015 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 20, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 13, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 13, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |