USPTO serial 86720183
SMART TONES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HENRY, NAKIA D
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 129 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SMART TONES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Cincinnati, OH
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Roger H. Bora
ROGER H BORA THOMPSON HINE LLP10050 INNOVATION DRIVE SUITE 400MIAMISBURG, OH 45342-4934UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer application software that transmits audio for any electronic device with a speaker or microphone and software and protocol for wireless data transmission to electronic devices via inaudible audio | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 22, 2017 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 8, 2017 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 8, 2017 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 27, 2017 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Dec 30, 2016 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 30, 2016 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 30, 2016 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 24, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 24, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 11, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 29, 2016 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 29, 2016 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 29, 2016 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 29, 2016 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 30, 2016 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| May 30, 2016 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 30, 2016 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 6, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 4, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 4, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 24, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 24, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 24, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 20, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 14, 2015 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 13, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |