USPTO serial 86720489
BENESEL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LAVOIE, RYAN CHRISTOPHER
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BENESEL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Laura McFarland-Taylor
LAURA MCFARLAND TAYLOR MCFARLAND TAYLOR ASSOCIATES1084 FOUR SEASONS LANEBOLINGBROOK, IL 60440-1401UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Selenium supplement for livestock | ACTIVE | Aug 6, 2015 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 20, 2017 | MAB0 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Apr 20, 2017 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Feb 10, 2017 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 10, 2017 | EXDM | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED AS MOOT | — |
| Feb 10, 2017 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Feb 9, 2017 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Feb 8, 2017 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Feb 8, 2017 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 8, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 7, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 7, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 25, 2017 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 25, 2017 | PGTT | PETITION GRANTED - TTAB APPEAL FILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2017 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jan 15, 2017 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 6, 2017 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 6, 2017 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 5, 2017 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 5, 2017 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 21, 2016 | RDX3 | NOTIFICATION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED | — |
| Nov 21, 2016 | RDX1 | ACTION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 21, 2016 | RRDX | ACTION REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED COUNTED NOT MAILED | — |
| Oct 31, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 30, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 30, 2016 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| May 30, 2016 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| May 30, 2016 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 30, 2016 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 9, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 7, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 7, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 31, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 31, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 31, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 25, 2016 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 25, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 10, 2015 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 10, 2015 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 10, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 10, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 13, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 13, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |