USPTO serial 86721235
AUTOMATION. ANALYTICS. BETTER BIOLOGY.
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DIBLE, JONATHON I
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with AUTOMATION. ANALYTICS. BETTER BIOLOGY.?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ira J. Schaefer
CHRISTIAN LAPOINTE Ira J. Schaefer11 AUDUBON ROADWAKEFIELD, MA 01880UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Cell culture apparatus for laboratory use, namely, incubators for cell and tissue cultures, parts and fittings for the aforesaid goods, cell culture dishes, cell culture flasks, cell culture multi-plates, cell culture inserts, cell analysis equipment, cell counting apparatus, cell sorting apparatus, cell feeding apparatus, cell passaging apparatus, cell plating apparatus, and cell evaluation apparatus; pharmaceutical apparatus and instruments for laboratory use, namely, incubators for cell and tissue cultures, parts and fittings for the aforesaid goods, cell culture dishes, cell culture flasks, cell culture multi-plates, cell culture inserts, cell analysis equipment, cell counting apparatus, cell sorting apparatus, cell feeding apparatus, cell passaging apparatus, cell plating apparatus, and cell evaluation apparatus; biotechnological laboratory apparatus and instruments, namely, incubators for cell and tissue cultures, parts and fittings for the aforesaid goods, cell culture dishes, cell culture flasks, cell culture multi-plates, cell culture inserts, cell analysis equipment, cell counting apparatus, cell sorting apparatus, cell feeding apparatus, cell passaging apparatus, cell plating apparatus, and cell evaluation apparatus; clinical diagnostic instruments for laboratory use, namely, incubators for cell and tissue cultures, parts and fittings for the aforesaid goods, cell culture dishes, cell culture flasks, cell culture multi-plates, cell culture inserts, cell analysis equipment, cell counting apparatus, cell sorting apparatus, cell feeding apparatus, cell passaging apparatus, cell plating apparatus, and cell evaluation apparatus; diagnostic apparatus for the detection of pathogens, genetic mutations, diseases or infections for laboratory or research use; regenerative medicine apparatus and instruments for laboratory use, namely, incubators for cell and tissue cultures, parts and fittings for the aforesaid goods, cell culture dishes, cell culture flasks, cell culture multi-plates, cell culture inserts, cell analysis equipment, cell counting apparatus, cell sorting apparatus, cell feeding apparatus, cell passaging apparatus, cell plating apparatus, and cell evaluation apparatus; temperature and climatic cabinets for life science, material science and drug discovery for industrial applications and laboratory purposes, in particular incubators for cell and tissue cultures; parts and fittings for the aforesaid goods; laboratory apparatus, namely, cell culture dishes, cell culture flasks, cell culture multi-plates, cell culture inserts, and cell culture beads for laboratory or medical use; laboratory apparatus, namely, cases for cell culture; laboratory incubators for culture and keeping of cells; laboratory apparatus and instruments for cell culture, namely, cell culture dishes, cell culture flasks, cell culture multi-plates, cell culture inserts and cell culture beads for laboratory or medical use; laboratory apparatus and instruments, namely, variable temperature incubators, variable temperature plates, variable humidity incubators, cell analysis equipment, cell counting apparatus, cell sorting apparatus, cell feeding apparatus, cell passaging apparatus, cell plating apparatus, and cell evaluation apparatus for laboratory or medical use | ACTIVE | Nov 23, 2018 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Thrive Bioscience, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Thrive Bioscience, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named AUTOMATION. ANALYTICS. BETTER BIOLOGY.
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 16, 2020 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 14, 2020 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 29, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 29, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 29, 2019 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 29, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 5, 2019 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 31, 2019 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2019 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jun 28, 2019 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 28, 2019 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 28, 2019 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 22, 2019 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 21, 2019 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 21, 2019 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 16, 2019 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Feb 16, 2019 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 16, 2019 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 16, 2018 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 14, 2018 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 14, 2018 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 14, 2018 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 17, 2018 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 15, 2018 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 15, 2018 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 15, 2018 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 17, 2017 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2017 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 15, 2017 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2017 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 15, 2017 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 14, 2017 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 12, 2017 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 12, 2017 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 12, 2017 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 16, 2016 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 21, 2016 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 21, 2016 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 1, 2016 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 16, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 16, 2016 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 16, 2016 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 16, 2016 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 16, 2016 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 13, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 11, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 11, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 21, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 21, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 21, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 15, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 14, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 14, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |