USPTO serial 86721314
AEROLASER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 8, 2018
- Examiner
- FRIEDMAN, LESLEE ANN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 120
What this means
Status 702 means the registration is active, Section 8 was accepted, and a Section 15 declaration of incontestability was also accepted. Incontestability strengthens your rights by limiting certain challenges after five years of continuous use. Continue use in commerce and plan for the 10-year Section 8 and 9 renewal.
Need help with AEROLASER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Devin Miller
Devin Miller Miller IP Law1186 E 4600 S, Ste 240Ogden, UT 84403UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Lasers for deterring, repelling and catching pests, namely, birds; audio speakers, amplifiers; radar apparatus; signaling mirrors; microphones; video camera equipment, namely, pan-tilt motors; thermal cameras; video cameras, solar panels for production of electricity, and lenses for deterring, repelling and catching pests, namely, birds; electronic controllers in the nature of computer hardware and computer software and computer peripheral devices for controlling laser pens in the nature of laser diodes and optical lenses; Laser sighting devices, Laser pointers, optical detectors, optical sensors for detecting the shape, proximity, movement, color, behavior and texture of birds, cars, airplanes, and humans; alarm monitoring system; precision measuring apparatus, namely, laser distance meters, LIDAR, and sensors for detecting the shape, proximity, movement, color, behavior and texture of birds, cars, airplanes, and humans; detection apparatus, namely, proximity detection sensors and sensors for detecting the shape, proximity, movement, color, behavior and texture of birds, cars, airplanes and humans; central processing units, namely, micro and signal processing units; processors, namely, motion and laser speed sensors for detecting the shape, proximity, movement, color, behavior and texture of birds, cars, airplanes and humans; detectors and observation instruments, namely, video cameras, and infrared cameras; optical lenses, precision measuring apparatus and remote-controlled apparatus, namely, RF, and wireless transmitters for use with and to support laser pens, laser floodlights and laser lighting for use in deterring, repelling and catching pests, including birds; Devices for focusing laser pens, laser floodlights and laser lighting, namely, lenses and filters; Electric and electronic apparatus and instruments and mechanical devices, namely, timers, dimmers, and beam shutters for distributing laser light used for the purpose of deterring, repelling and catching pests, including birds | ACTIVE | Feb 28, 2013 |
| 011 | Lighting apparatus, namely, laser light installations comprised of buttons, pan tilt motors, laser diodes, lenses, solar panels, and batteries; and lighting installations for buildings, vehicles, aircraft, helicopters, poles, and frames; Laser flashlights; Lights with lasers, namely, laser beam projectors; Laser floodlights; laser floodlights and laser lighting installations for deterring, repelling and catching pests, including birds | ACTIVE | Feb 28, 2013 |
| 037 | Pest control relating to birds for residential and commercial buildings, airports, golf courses, fisheries, factories, oil and gas plants, harbors, parks, stadiums, solar farms, wind farms, ships, helipads, and offshore platforms; Removing birds from residential and commercial buildings, airports, golf courses, fisheries, factories, oil and gas plants, harbors, parks, stadiums, solar farms, wind farms, ships, helipads, and offshore platforms with the aid of laser lighting; installation, maintenance, and repair of computer hardware, namely, computer controlled electronic apparatus and instruments in the nature of laser pens, laser floodlights and laser lighting, laser distance meters, LIDAR, and sensors for detecting the shape, proximity, movement, color, behavior and texture of birds, cars, airplanes and humans in order to deter, repel and catch pests, including birds | ACTIVE | Feb 28, 2013 |
| 044 | Pest control relating to birds farms and forests; Removing birds from farms and forests with the aid of laser lighting | ACTIVE | Feb 28, 2013 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Bird Control Group B.V.
- Other trademarks owned by Bird Control Group B.V.
- Other trademarks owned by Bird Control Group B.V.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 044
- Similar marks named AEROLASER
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 20, 2023 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 20, 2023 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Dec 20, 2023 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 26, 2023 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| May 8, 2023 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2019 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 5, 2019 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 8, 2018 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 5, 2018 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2018 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 29, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 29, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 27, 2018 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 14, 2018 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 14, 2018 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 3, 2017 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Nov 3, 2017 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 3, 2017 | CNFR | SU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 31, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 31, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 25, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 11, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 19, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 19, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 19, 2017 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 5, 2017 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 31, 2017 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 20, 2017 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2017 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Sep 20, 2016 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 26, 2016 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 26, 2016 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 6, 2016 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 21, 2016 | FIXD | ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 17, 2016 | ERRR | ON HOLD - ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Jun 16, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 16, 2016 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 16, 2016 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 16, 2016 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 16, 2016 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 7, 2016 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 7, 2016 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2016 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2016 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 23, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 21, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 21, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 24, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 24, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 24, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 23, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 14, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 14, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |