USPTO serial 86721711
DUNE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MARTIN, EUGENIA K
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DUNE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David P. Cooper
DAVID P. COOPER Kolisch Hartwell P C520 SW Yamhill St Ste 300Portland, OR 97204-1324UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | electrical adapters; alarm bells; audio- and video-receivers; baby monitors; batteries for lighting; beacons, luminous; cameras; chargers for electric batteries; computer peripheral devices; electric door bells; electrified rails for mounting spot lights; fire alarms; light dimmers, electric light regulators; light dimmers; electric locks; meteorological instruments; microphones; remote control apparatus, namely, remote controls for controlling electric lighting devices and apparatus; sirens; smoke detectors; electrical sockets, electrical plugs and other electrical connectors; switches, electric; temperature indicators; theft prevention units; transmitters for telecommunications; video baby monitors | ACTIVE | — |
| 011 | Chinese lanterns; fairy lights; cycle lights; diving lights; germicidal lamps for purifying air; luminous house numbers; laboratory lamps; lamps; lanterns for lighting; light bulbs; light bulbs; light diffusers; light-emitting diodes; electric lights for Christmas trees; safety lamps; sockets for electric lights; street lamps; standard lamps; tanning beds, flashlights; searchlights; ultraviolet ray lamps; lighting apparatus and installations, namely, mood lighting apparatus and installations; ambient lighting apparatus and installations; work lighting apparatus and installations; indoor lighting apparatus and installations; outdoor lighting apparatus and installations; recessed lighting apparatus and installations; ceiling lighting apparatus and installations; wall lighting apparatus and installations; floor lighting apparatus and installations; portable lighting apparatus and installations; bathroom lighting apparatus and installations; LED lighting apparatus and installations; connected lighting apparatus and installations; wireless internet-connected lighting apparatus and installations; Internet-connected lighting apparatus and installations; remote-controlled lighting apparatus and installations; cell-phone-controlled lighting apparatus and installations; interactive lighting apparatus and installations; dynamic lighting apparatus and installations; smart lighting apparatus and installations | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by TAOLIGHT COMPANY LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by TAOLIGHT COMPANY LIMITED
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Similar marks named DUNE
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 3, 2020 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 3, 2020 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 20, 2019 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 18, 2019 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 18, 2019 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Dec 18, 2019 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 28, 2019 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 26, 2019 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 26, 2019 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 26, 2019 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 4, 2019 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 2, 2019 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 2, 2019 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 2, 2019 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 6, 2018 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 4, 2018 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 4, 2018 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 4, 2018 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 2, 2018 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 7, 2017 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 7, 2017 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 18, 2017 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2017 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 2, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 20, 2017 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 20, 2017 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 20, 2017 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 20, 2017 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 31, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 30, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 30, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 2, 2017 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Mar 2, 2017 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Mar 2, 2017 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Sep 21, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 21, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 8, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 31, 2016 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 30, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 30, 2016 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 30, 2016 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 30, 2016 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 30, 2016 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 3, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 3, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 3, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 23, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 17, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 14, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |