USPTO serial 86722887
CONNECTING THE DOTS IN HEALTHCARE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BODRI, JOHN PETER
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CONNECTING THE DOTS IN HEALTHCARE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Framingham, MA
Nashville, TN
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lori Shyavitz,
Lori Shyavitz, McCarter & English, LLP265 FRANKLIN STREETBOSTON, MA 02110-3113UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Pharmaceutical preparations for use in the diagnosis, prevention, management and treatment of metabolic, viral, endocrine, musculoskeletal, cardiovascular, cardiopulmonary, genitourinary, sexual dysfunction, oncological, hepatological, opthalmic, respiratory, neurological, gastrointestinal, hormonal, dermatological, psychiatric and immune system related conditions, diseases and disorders; diagnostic preparations for medical and veterinary use; pharmaceutical preparations for wounds; clinical medical reagents; diagnostic kits comprised of medical reagents for medical and clinical use in disease testing, bodily fluid testing, biometric testing, cardiovascular testing, heart rate testing, organ function testing, hydration testing, and nutrition testing | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 8, 2020 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 8, 2020 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 8, 2019 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 7, 2019 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 4, 2019 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Oct 4, 2019 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 20, 2019 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 18, 2019 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 18, 2019 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Apr 18, 2019 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 3, 2018 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 3, 2018 | NOAC | CORRECTED NOA E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 2, 2018 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 2, 2018 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 2, 2018 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 18, 2018 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2018 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 18, 2018 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 18, 2018 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 14, 2018 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 12, 2018 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 12, 2018 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 12, 2018 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 12, 2018 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 20, 2017 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2017 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 18, 2017 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2017 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 18, 2017 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 21, 2017 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 21, 2017 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 1, 2017 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 11, 2017 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 11, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 11, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 11, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 22, 2016 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 22, 2016 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 22, 2016 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 22, 2016 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jun 22, 2016 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jun 22, 2016 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 22, 2016 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 1, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 31, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 31, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 31, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 30, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 30, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 30, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 24, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 17, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 17, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |