Drawing for CORE FEST

USPTO serial 86723697

CORE FEST

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CARLYLE, SHAUNIA P
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CORE FEST?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jeff R Cohen

JEFF R COHEN Millen, White, Zelano & Branigan, P.C.2200 Clarendon Blvd Ste 1400Arlington, VA 22201-3360UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Conducting entertainment exhibitions in the nature of a music, cultural and lifestyle event; Entertainment services in the nature of presenting live musical performances; Organizing music and lifestyle festivals for cultural or entertainment purposesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 4, 2017MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 4, 2017ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 2, 2017NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 7, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Mar 7, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 15, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jan 28, 2017PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 26, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 12, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 12, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 5, 2017TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 5, 2017ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Jun 8, 2016GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 8, 2016GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 8, 2016CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
May 18, 2016TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 18, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 18, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 18, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 10, 2016NAUDREPORT UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - COMPLETED—
Apr 26, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 26, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 20, 2016ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 4, 2016PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Apr 4, 2016TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 2, 2015GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 2, 2015GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 2, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 28, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 18, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 17, 2015NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance