Drawing for PVR

USPTO serial 86724337

PVR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
BIBBINS, ODESSA
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PVR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Laila S. Wolfgram

LAILA S. WOLFGRAM STINSON LEONARD STREET LLP7700 FORSYTH BLVDSTE 1100SAINT LOUIS, MO 63105-1821

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011Swimming pool products and components, namely, in-floor pop up pool water cleaning and circulation systems comprising water cleaning and filtering unitsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 12, 2018MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 12, 2018ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 5, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Aug 3, 2017EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Aug 3, 2017EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Aug 3, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 11, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Feb 9, 2017EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Feb 9, 2017EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Feb 9, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 9, 2016NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 14, 2016NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Jun 14, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 25, 2016NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
May 9, 2016PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Apr 27, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Apr 15, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Apr 15, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 8, 2016ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Mar 28, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 28, 2016TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Sep 26, 2015GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 26, 2015GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 26, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 22, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Aug 18, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Aug 17, 2015NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance