USPTO serial 86726692
SPIRAL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 10, 2021
- Examiner
- CHADAB, SETH WILLIG
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with SPIRAL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $299*
Plus Government fees of $325
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Croydon Surrey CR0 2BQ, GB
Croydon Surrey CR0 2BQ, GB
SPIRAL DIRECT DEVELOPMENTS LIMITED
LONDON, GB
Other trademarks owned by SPIRAL DIRECT DEVELOPMENTS LIMITED
Croydon Surrey CR0 2BQ, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert L. Wolter
Robert L. Wolter Wolter Van Dyke Davis, PLLC1900 Summit Tower Blvd, Suite 140Orlando, FL 32810UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Clothing, namely, shirts, t-shirts, sweatshirts, jackets, shorts, leggings, pajamas, blouses, camisoles, dresses, swimwear, children's t-shirts, one-piece bodysuits for infants | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Spiral Direct Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by Spiral Direct Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by SPIRAL DIRECT DEVELOPMENTS LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by Spiral Direct Ltd.
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named SPIRAL
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 10, 2026 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 30, 2024 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Oct 5, 2022 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 5, 2022 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Oct 5, 2022 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 5, 2022 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 10, 2021 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 25, 2021 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 25, 2021 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 5, 2021 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2019 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 28, 2019 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 23, 2019 | PCDE | PETITION TO DIRECTOR DENIED | — |
| Feb 8, 2019 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jan 30, 2019 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jan 19, 2019 | PCRC | PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 19, 2019 | TPDR | TEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 14, 2019 | ISPO | WITHDRAWN FROM ISSUE - PETITIONS OFFICE REQUEST | — |
| Jan 7, 2019 | TPAD | TEAS PETITION TO AMEND BASIS RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 20, 2018 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 20, 2018 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 31, 2018 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2018 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 16, 2018 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2018 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 15, 2018 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 27, 2018 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 19, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 21, 2018 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 21, 2018 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 21, 2018 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 2, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 2, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 30, 2018 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 9, 2018 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2018 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2018 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 8, 2018 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 3, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 3, 2018 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jan 2, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 2, 2018 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 18, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 18, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 13, 2017 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 29, 2017 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 29, 2017 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 29, 2017 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 21, 2016 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 21, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 11, 2016 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 10, 2016 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 10, 2016 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 10, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 10, 2016 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| May 17, 2016 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 17, 2016 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 16, 2016 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| May 16, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 7, 2016 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 7, 2016 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 7, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 4, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 4, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 4, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 4, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 11, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 11, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 11, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 30, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 30, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 21, 2015 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 20, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 20, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |