Drawing for RANCHO ALEGRE

USPTO serial 86727749

RANCHO ALEGRE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
PAQUIN, SAMUEL ROBERT
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with RANCHO ALEGRE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

RONALD KOCH

RONALD J KOCH RONALD J KOCH ATTORNEY AT LAWPO BOX 30870COLUMBUS, OH 43230-0870UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
043Restaurant services; take-out restaurant servicesACTIVEJul 9, 2008

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 17, 2017MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jul 17, 2017ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jul 17, 2017EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Mar 31, 2017EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Feb 21, 2017RBFTREPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES—
Jan 27, 2017GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 27, 2017GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 27, 2017CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Dec 30, 2016JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Dec 20, 2016EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Dec 20, 2016EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jun 24, 2016GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jun 24, 2016GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 24, 2016CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 3, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 2, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 2, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 2, 2015GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 2, 2015GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 2, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 1, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 20, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance