USPTO serial 86728536
GREENLIGHT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HOWARD, PARKER WALDRIP
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GREENLIGHT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Daniel I. Schloss
Daniel I. Schloss GREENBERG TRAURIG LLPOne Vanderbilt AvenueNEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Software as a service for non-financial, qualitative entertainment industry business due diligence evaluation of investment opportunities in film, television, literary, and video game properties | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 28, 2023 | FIXD | ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 23, 2023 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 23, 2023 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 23, 2022 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 22, 2022 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 21, 2022 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 21, 2022 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jun 21, 2022 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 21, 2022 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 17, 2022 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Feb 26, 2022 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2022 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 23, 2022 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 21, 2022 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 20, 2022 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jan 20, 2022 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 20, 2022 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 18, 2022 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 17, 2022 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 17, 2021 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jun 18, 2021 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 16, 2021 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 16, 2021 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 16, 2021 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 19, 2020 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2020 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 17, 2020 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2020 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 11, 2020 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2020 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 9, 2020 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2020 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 17, 2019 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 22, 2019 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 22, 2019 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 2, 2019 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 13, 2019 | ERRR | ON HOLD - ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Sep 11, 2019 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 11, 2019 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 9, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 9, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 3, 2019 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 3, 2019 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 3, 2019 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 3, 2019 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Mar 1, 2019 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Mar 1, 2019 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 1, 2019 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 9, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 8, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 8, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 10, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 10, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 10, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 24, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 24, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 17, 2018 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 19, 2018 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 19, 2018 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 19, 2018 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 4, 2018 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 28, 2017 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 28, 2017 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 28, 2017 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 4, 2017 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 4, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 24, 2016 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 24, 2016 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 24, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 8, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 7, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 7, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 6, 2016 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 6, 2016 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 8, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 8, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 8, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 2, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 22, 2015 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 21, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |