Drawing for VITRO TV

USPTO serial 86729842

VITRO TV

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
NEWKIRK, MERIDITH E.
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VITRO TV?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Steven D. Smit

STEVEN D. SMIT Graves Dougherty Hearon & Moody P C401 Congress Ave Ste 2200Austin, TX 78701-3790UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Retail store services in the field of entertainment, namely, movies, musical and audiovisual works and related merchandise, namely digital displays, set top boxes, digital modems and hardware for displaying remotely hosted content, provided via the internet and other computer and electronic communication networksACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 17, 2018MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 17, 2018ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 19, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Oct 18, 2017EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Oct 11, 2017NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Oct 11, 2017TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Oct 11, 2017PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Oct 11, 2017PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Sep 13, 2017EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Mar 31, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 31, 2017NOACCORRECTED NOA E-MAILED—
Mar 30, 2017EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Mar 30, 2017DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Mar 20, 2017AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Mar 15, 2017ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Mar 8, 2017EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Mar 8, 2017DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Mar 8, 2017ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Mar 7, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 13, 2016NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 19, 2016NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jul 19, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 29, 2016NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jun 10, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 9, 2016XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jun 9, 2016GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 9, 2016GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 9, 2016CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jun 8, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 7, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 7, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 10, 2015GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 10, 2015GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 10, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 3, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 25, 2015MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
Aug 24, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 24, 2015NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance