Drawing for HARD EDGE

USPTO serial 86731691

HARD EDGE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
GOODMAN, WENDY BETH
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HARD EDGE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Dax Alvarez

DAX ALVAREZ Snell & Wilmer L L P400 E Van Buren St Ste 1900Phoenix, AZ 85004-2509UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
018Trunks; attaché cases; traveling bags; garment bags for travel; rucksacks; handbags; beach bags; textile shopping bags; shoulder bags; clutch bags; tote bags; duffel bags; luggage; suitcases; sport bags; athletic bags; book bags; messenger bags; brief cases; cosmetic and vanity cases sold empty for cosmetics, make-up and perfumes; pocket wallets; purses; key cases; backpacksACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 20, 2017MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 20, 2017ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 22, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Mar 20, 2017EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Mar 20, 2017EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Mar 20, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 19, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Oct 17, 2016EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Oct 17, 2016EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Oct 17, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 14, 2016CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED
Sep 14, 2016COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED
Apr 19, 2016NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 23, 2016NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Feb 23, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 3, 2016NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Dec 19, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Dec 15, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Dec 14, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 14, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 12, 2015GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Dec 12, 2015GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Dec 12, 2015CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Dec 3, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Aug 26, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Aug 24, 2015NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance