Drawing for WINNERS BLEND THE HEALTH CO. DR S BEAUTY

USPTO serial 86731727

WINNERS BLEND THE HEALTH CO. DR S BEAUTY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CLAYTON, CHERYL A
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WINNERS BLEND THE HEALTH CO. DR S BEAUTY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Eric T. Fingerhut

Eric T. Fingerhut Dykema Gossett PLLC1301 K Street, N.W.Suite 1100 WestWashington, DC 20005

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Meat, fish, not live, poultry; meat extracts; preserved frozen, dried and cooked fruits and vegetables; jellies, jams, compotes; eggs, milk and milk products, excluding ice cream, ice milk and frozen yogurtACTIVE—
032Mineral and aerated waters; fruit drinks and fruit juicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 7, 2019MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 7, 2019ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 12, 2019EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 11, 2019EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Mar 1, 2019EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Mar 1, 2019EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 8, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 6, 2018EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Sep 6, 2018EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Sep 6, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 7, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 5, 2018EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Mar 5, 2018EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Mar 5, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 26, 2017ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 26, 2017REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Sep 20, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 20, 2017NOACCORRECTED NOA E-MAILED—
Sep 19, 2017DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Sep 19, 2017EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Sep 19, 2017AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Sep 1, 2017DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Sep 1, 2017ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Sep 1, 2017EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Sep 1, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 4, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 2, 2017EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Mar 2, 2017EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Mar 2, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 6, 2016NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 12, 2016NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jul 12, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 22, 2016NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jun 7, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 7, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 6, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 6, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 6, 2016TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 10, 2015GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 10, 2015GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 10, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 3, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 27, 2015MDSMNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Aug 26, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 24, 2015NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance