Drawing for SAF-T-ZONE

USPTO serial 86731945

SAF-T-ZONE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
O'BRIEN, JENNIFER LYNN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SAF-T-ZONE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

David P. Petersen

DAVID P. PETERSEN Klarquist Sparkman121 SW Salmon St Ste 1600Portland, OR 97204-2988UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Motor vehicle accessories, namely, a detection system comprised of sensors for detecting and communicating the presence of objects and individuals in proximity or nearby to a motor vehicle and for alerting a vehicle driver upon this detection; motor vehicle parts and accessories, namely, child detection systems for buses; Motor vehicle accessories, namely, child detection systems for buses comprised of sensors for detecting and communicating the presence of objects and individuals in proximity to the bus and for alerting the bus driverACTIVE—
012Safety features for motor vehicles, namely, buses, in the nature of alarm systems specifically adapted for buses for detecting and indicating the presence of objects and individuals; buses featuring child detection system comprising sensors for detecting and communicating the presence of objects and individuals in proximity to the bus and for alerting the bus driverACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 15, 2019MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 14, 2019ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 7, 2019EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 6, 2019EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Mar 6, 2019AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Feb 28, 2019EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Feb 28, 2019EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 8, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 6, 2018EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Sep 6, 2018EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Sep 6, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 27, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 25, 2018EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jan 25, 2018EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jan 25, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 15, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 13, 2017EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Sep 13, 2017EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Sep 13, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 15, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 13, 2017EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Mar 13, 2017EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Mar 13, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 13, 2016NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 19, 2016NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jul 19, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 29, 2016NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jun 13, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 11, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 10, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 10, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 10, 2015GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 10, 2015GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 10, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 3, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 27, 2015MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
Aug 26, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 24, 2015NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance