USPTO serial 86732526
CCG CERTIFIED CHARITABLE GIVING ALLIANCE GIVING IS GOOD BUSINESS.
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ASKEW, MEGAN RUTH
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 108
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CCG CERTIFIED CHARITABLE GIVING ALLIANCE GIVING IS GOOD BUSINESS.?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Scottsdale, AZ
Scottsdale, AZ
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey Herman
JEFFREY HERMAN Law Office Of Jeffrey Herman7272 E Indian School Rd Ste 540Scottsdale, AZ 85251-3921UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Charitable services, namely, coordination of non-monetary contributions to charities and non-profits; Managed care services, namely, utilization review and pre-certification services; Promoting charitable giving that reflects the core values of the donor by providing a method to identify the donor's core values and to select charities that foster those values; Promoting the charitable services of others, namely, providing individuals with information about various charities for the purpose of making donations to charities; Promotional services, namely, promoting the charities of others | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Business training; Business training in the field of charitable giving and donation; Charitable services, namely, providing training in the field of performing charitable activities within different geographic regions; Computer education training services; Education services, namely, providing career re-training in donating and giving to charity in the fields of real estate; Education services, namely, training educators in the field of teaching and training individuals of a professional field on how their career and occupation lends to efficiently donating money and time to charity to promote society and individual careers and providing curricula in connection therewith; Educational services, namely, conducting classes, seminars, conferences, workshops, retreats, camps and field trips in the field of teaching and training individuals of a professional field on how their career and occupation lends to efficiently donating money and time to charity to promote society and individual careers and distribution of training material in connection therewith; Educational services, namely, conducting website delivery education modules and certifying enrollees who complete said modules in the fields of performance of charitable activity and charitable donations and distribution of training materials in connection therewith; Educational services, namely, providing training of how to donate, perform charitable activity, and create a mutual benefit for society and individual career in various fields of work for certification in the field of real estate license holders, attorneys, doctors, and other professional fields; Educational services, namely, providing web-based and classroom training for certification of teachers and continuing education for teachers and principals | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Robin Leigh
- Other trademarks owned by Robin Leigh
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named CCG CERTIFIED CHARITABLE GIVING ALLIANCE GIVING IS GOOD BUSINESS.
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 16, 2024 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 23, 2017 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 23, 2017 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 22, 2017 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2017 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 20, 2017 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2017 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 20, 2016 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 26, 2016 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 26, 2016 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 6, 2016 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 17, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 17, 2016 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 17, 2016 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 17, 2016 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 17, 2016 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 14, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 13, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 13, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 14, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 14, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 14, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 6, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 27, 2015 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 26, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 25, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |