Drawing for BOD

USPTO serial 86733555

BOD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CALLAGHAN, BRIAN P
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BOD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Daniel Cotman

DOUGLAS M. KAUTZKY, Cotman IP Law Group, PLC35 Hugus Alley Suite 210Pasadena, CA 91103UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025Athletic apparel, namely, shirts, pants, jackets, footwear, hats and caps, athletic uniforms; Athletic pants; Athletic shirts; Athletic shorts; Caps; Gloves as clothing; Hats; Headbands for clothing; Shirts; Sweat shirts; T-shirts; Tee shirts; Tops; Women's athletic tops with built-in brasACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 4, 2019MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 4, 2019ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 3, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Aug 2, 2018EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jul 30, 2018EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jul 30, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 30, 2018NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 20, 2017NEWNNEW NOA TO ISSUE—
Dec 20, 2017AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Dec 11, 2017NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Dec 9, 2017PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Dec 9, 2017PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Dec 9, 2017ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 9, 2017REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Dec 9, 2017TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 6, 2017UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
Sep 18, 2017MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 18, 2017ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 14, 2017IUCNNOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED—
Feb 14, 2017NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 30, 2016ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED—
Aug 31, 2016ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Aug 16, 2016NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Aug 16, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 27, 2016NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jul 11, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 11, 2016XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jul 11, 2016GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 11, 2016GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 11, 2016CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Dec 14, 2015GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 14, 2015GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 14, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 7, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 26, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 26, 2015NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance