Drawing for SWEET HEAT

USPTO serial 86735022

SWEET HEAT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
PEETE, KYLE C
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SWEET HEAT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Bassam N. Ibrahim

BASSAM N IBRAHIM B UCHANAN INGERSOLL & ROONEY PC1737 KING STSUITE 500ALEXANDRIA, VA 22314-2727

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Yoghurt-based products in the nature of beverages and dipsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 1, 2018MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 1, 2018ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 16, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 16, 2018NOACCORRECTED NOA E-MAILED—
Feb 15, 2018EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 15, 2018DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Feb 15, 2018AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Feb 12, 2018EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 12, 2018DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Feb 12, 2018ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Feb 12, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 29, 2017NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 14, 2017TMBNTTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS—
Jul 14, 2017OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Jul 14, 2017OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
Jul 13, 2016OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Apr 14, 2016ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Mar 15, 2016NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Mar 15, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 24, 2016NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Feb 9, 2016PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 30, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 6, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 5, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 5, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 15, 2015GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 15, 2015GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 15, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 7, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 5, 2015AMPXPRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
Oct 2, 2015ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 25, 2015ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 10, 2015PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Aug 27, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 27, 2015NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance