USPTO serial 86735800
FOREVER EMOJI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CORWIN, KEVIN SCOTT
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FOREVER EMOJI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Marijan Stephan Hucke,
Marijan Stephan Hucke, HUCKE LAW FIRM1732 1ST AVE # 27500NEW YORK, NY 10128-5177UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Folders for papers; Document files; Albums, namely, sticker albums and photo albums; Stickers; paper coasters for beer glasses; Erasers; Writing paper; Seals; Marker pens; Notebooks; Stencils; paper expanding Files; Paper handtowels; memo Pads; Greeting cards; Postcards; Paper handkerchiefs; Toilet paper; Tablecloths of paper; Paper bags; Pencil boxes; Writing instrument cases; Bags of paper or plastics, for packaging; Passport covers; Bookbinding material; Books in the field of Comics, Children Coloring Books, Fairy Tales; Bookbindings; Rubber erasers; Erasing shields; Newspapers; Drawings; Sketch pads; Wrapping paper; Table napkins of paper; paper and plastic Transparencies; Cardboard articles, namely, cardboard boxes, cardboard; Adhesive bands for stationery or household purposes; Writing instruments; blank writing and drawing books; Document portfolios; Writing implements; Signboards of paper and cardboard; drawing Shields; Musical greeting cards; Luminous paper; Bibs of paper; Calendars; Envelopes; Elastic bands for offices; Gummed tape for stationery or household use; Graphic representations; Graphic art reproductions; Correcting fluids for type; Plastic film for wrapping; Forms, printed; Photographs; Paintings, framed and unframed; Figurines of papier mache; Bottle wrappers of cardboard or paper; Filter paper; Chromolithographs; Flags of paper; Covers, namely, school book covers, document covers; Comic books; desktop Cabinets for stationery; document folders in the form of wallets; Tracing paper; Drawer liners of paper, perfumed and not; Writing tablets; Note pads; School supplies kits containing various combinations of selected school supplies, namely, writing instruments, pens, pencils, mechanical pencils, erasers, markers, crayons, highlighter pens, folders, notebooks, paper, protractors, paper clips, pencil sharpeners, writing grips, glue and book marks; Printed tickets; Cardboard; Colored cardboard; Place mats of paper | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Hüsges, Marco
- Other trademarks owned by EMOJI COMPANY GMBH
- Other trademarks owned by EMOJI COMPANY GMBH
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Similar marks named FOREVER EMOJI
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 25, 2022 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 25, 2022 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 29, 2022 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2022 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 25, 2022 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 24, 2022 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Mar 24, 2022 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 24, 2022 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 24, 2022 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 24, 2022 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 20, 2021 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jun 22, 2021 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 18, 2021 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 18, 2021 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jun 18, 2021 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 22, 2020 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 18, 2020 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 18, 2020 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 18, 2020 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 23, 2020 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 22, 2020 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 19, 2020 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 19, 2020 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jun 19, 2020 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 19, 2020 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 18, 2020 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 11, 2020 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2020 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 10, 2020 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 23, 2020 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 23, 2020 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Mar 23, 2020 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 23, 2020 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 21, 2020 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 20, 2020 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 18, 2019 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 18, 2019 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 23, 2019 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 23, 2019 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 3, 2019 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2019 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 14, 2019 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 14, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 14, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 13, 2019 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 13, 2019 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 8, 2019 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Feb 6, 2019 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2019 | PGTT | PETITION GRANTED - TTAB APPEAL FILED | — |
| Feb 5, 2019 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Dec 31, 2018 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Dec 31, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 31, 2018 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 30, 2018 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 29, 2018 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 29, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 25, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 26, 2018 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Feb 26, 2018 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 26, 2018 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 8, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 8, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 7, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 31, 2018 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 30, 2018 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 30, 2018 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 30, 2018 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 30, 2017 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 30, 2017 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 30, 2017 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 9, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 9, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 9, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 27, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 27, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 27, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 21, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 21, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 21, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 15, 2016 | LOPT | LETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED | — |
| Jun 29, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 29, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 29, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 22, 2016 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jun 4, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 3, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 3, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 3, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 3, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 3, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 4, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 28, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 28, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |