Drawing for CYBER REVOLUTION

USPTO serial 86736821

CYBER REVOLUTION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CAHILL, CLARE GALLAGHER
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 104

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CYBER REVOLUTION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Chun T. Wright

CHUN T. WRIGHT LAW OFFICE OF CHUN T. WRIGHT, PLLC1775 Eye Street, NWSuite 1150Washington, DC 20006

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Business strategic planning advisory services in the field of cybersecurity and intelligence; business consultation in the field of communications, information assurance, and cybersecurityACTIVE—
041Educational and training services, namely, developing, arranging and conducting educational and training seminars, conferences, courses, and workshops in the field of cybersecurity, including cybersecurity systems, policies and procedures, how to identify and defend external cyber attacks and how to evaluate, test and solve cybersecurity problemsACTIVE—
042Software development consulting in the field of cybersecurity; computer software development; computer security consulting; computer cybersecurity consultancy; consulting services related to cybersecurity, namely, data protection, critical information protection and securing critical assets and infrastructure from external cyber attack; computer security services, namely, providing assessment of crisis action planning comprised of cybersecurity audits, vulnerability and threat detection analysis, monitoring of computer systems and computer networks for security purposes, network traffic monitoring and analysis, network identity monitoring and management, network access and authentication monitoring and management, and continuity of operations response, namely, conducting recovery operations for the recovery of computersACTIVE—
045Consulting services in the field of maintaining security and integrity of databasesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 28, 2016MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 28, 2016ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 26, 2016NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 1, 2016NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Mar 1, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 10, 2016NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Dec 17, 2015TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 9, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 8, 2015XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Dec 8, 2015GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Dec 8, 2015GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Dec 8, 2015CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Dec 8, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 28, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 28, 2015NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance