Drawing for BAY FRESH

USPTO serial 86737214

BAY FRESH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
O'BRIEN, JENNIFER LYNN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BAY FRESH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michael B. Chesal

Michael B. Chesal Peretz Chesal & Herrmann, P.L.1 S.E. 3rd Avenue, Suite 1820SunTrust International CenterMiami, FL 33131

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Meat, fish, poultry and game, not live, meat extracts; preserved, frozen, dried and cooked fruits and vegetablesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 13, 2021MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 13, 2021ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 14, 2021EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 12, 2021EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
May 12, 2021EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
May 12, 2021EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 12, 2020EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Nov 10, 2020EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Nov 10, 2020EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Nov 10, 2020EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 12, 2020NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 17, 2020NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Mar 17, 2020PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 26, 2020NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Feb 11, 2020CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 5, 2020XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Feb 5, 2020GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 5, 2020GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 5, 2020CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jan 13, 2020TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 13, 2020CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 3, 2020ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jul 3, 2019GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jul 3, 2019GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 3, 2019CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 6, 2019RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Nov 29, 2018RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
May 14, 2018RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Nov 13, 2017RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jul 7, 2017ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 7, 2017REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 9, 2017GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 9, 2017GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 9, 2017CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Apr 13, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 13, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 10, 2017NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Apr 10, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 10, 2017PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Apr 10, 2017PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Feb 10, 2017MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 10, 2017ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 14, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 14, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 14, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 13, 2016AAUANOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED—
Jul 12, 2016IUAAUSE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED—
Jun 22, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 22, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 22, 2016AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jun 22, 2016ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 16, 2016IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Jun 16, 2016EAAUTEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED—
Jun 16, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 16, 2015GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 16, 2015GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 16, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 9, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 1, 2015MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Aug 29, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 29, 2015NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance