Drawing for DISCOUNT GREEN DRY CLEANERS THE ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY DRY CLEANER THAT CARES

USPTO serial 86737244

DISCOUNT GREEN DRY CLEANERS THE ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY DRY CLEANER THAT CARES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MARSH, BRANDON N
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with DISCOUNT GREEN DRY CLEANERS THE ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY DRY CLEANER THAT CARES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Raj Abhyanker

Raj Abhyanker LegalForce RAPC Worldwide, P.C.446 E Southern AveTempe, AZ 85282UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
040Dry cleaning; Textile, leather and fur treatment, applying finishes to textiles, cloth waterproofing/fabric waterproofing, cloth fireproofing/fabric fireproofing/textile fireproofing, cloth dyeing, cloth pre-shrinking, crease-resistant treatment for clothing, dyeing services, textile dyeing, fabric bleaching, fulling of cloth, fur dyeing, fur conditioning, fur mothproofing, fur glossing, fur satining, leather staining, leather working, permanent-press treatment of fabrics, quilting, shoe staining, skin dressing, textile treating/cloth treating, textile mothproofing, all the foregoing being environmentally and ecologically friendlyACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ARAA): This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 11, 2019ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 11, 2019REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Aug 22, 2017ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 22, 2017REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Aug 2, 2017TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 12, 2016MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 12, 2016MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 12, 2016ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 18, 2015CEPECOMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION ENTERED—
Dec 15, 2015ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 15, 2015GEANNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED—
Dec 15, 2015GEAPEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED—
Dec 15, 2015CPEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED—
Dec 9, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 1, 2015MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Aug 31, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 29, 2015NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance