USPTO serial 86737919
Serial No. 86737919
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SPARER, KATERINA DOROTHY
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with Serial No. 86737919?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Redwood City, CA
San Carlos, CA
GUANGZHOU EHANG INTELLIGENT TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD.
TIANHE DISTRICT, GUANGZHOU, CN
Other trademarks owned by GUANGZHOU EHANG INTELLIGENT TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD.
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable mobile applications for control of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs); Remote controls for unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs); Software for flying, controlling, and monitoring drones, unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), and unmanned aerial systems (UAS) in the nature of drones; Computer software, hardware and peripheral devices for use in navigation, namely, navigation systems comprised of sensors and GPS which can be used for unmanned aerial devices; drone software for flying, controlling, and monitoring drones and instructional manuals therefor sold as a unit; unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) software for flying, controlling, and monitoring unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) and instructional manuals therefor sold as a unit; unmanned aerial systems (UAS) software for flying, controlling, and monitoring unmanned aerial systems (UAS) in the nature of drones and instructional manuals therefor sold as a unit; Accessories for drones, unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) and unmanned aerial systems (UAS) in the nature of drones, namely, batteries, camera mounts, and computer monitors | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 10, 2018 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Nov 8, 2017 | WOAG | WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED | — |
| Nov 8, 2017 | WOAR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 11, 2017 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 11, 2017 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 8, 2017 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2017 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 6, 2017 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2017 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 13, 2016 | NOAC | CORRECTED NOA E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 12, 2016 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 11, 2016 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 12, 2016 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 12, 2016 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 9, 2016 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 14, 2016 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 14, 2016 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 25, 2016 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 5, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 5, 2016 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 5, 2016 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 5, 2016 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 5, 2016 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 28, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 27, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 27, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 16, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 16, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 16, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 9, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 1, 2015 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 31, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 29, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |