Drawing for THE ( LACERATOR ) ... HE WONT BE BACK

USPTO serial 86738911

THE ( LACERATOR ) ... HE WONT BE BACK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RINKER, ANTHONY MICHAEL
Law office
PETITIONS OFFICE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THE ( LACERATOR ) ... HE WONT BE BACK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
008Hand-to-hand combat weapons, namely, knuckle dustersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 24, 2017PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED—
Mar 9, 2017PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED—
Feb 27, 2017APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Jan 30, 2017PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Jan 30, 2017MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 23, 2017MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 28, 2016MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 28, 2016ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 26, 2016NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 1, 2016NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Mar 1, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 10, 2016NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Dec 18, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 18, 2015XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Dec 18, 2015GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Dec 18, 2015GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Dec 18, 2015CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Dec 15, 2015GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Dec 15, 2015GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Dec 15, 2015CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Dec 10, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 1, 2015MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
Aug 31, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance