CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for NEXUS

USPTO serial 86739685

NEXUS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
TRUSILO, KELLY JEAN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NEXUS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Gregory J. Penoyer

GREGORY J. PENOYER Proskauer Rose1 International Pl Fl 22Boston, MA 02110-2639UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Business management consulting and advisory services, namely, process analysis and optimization through the use of an iterative and incremental frameworkACTIVE—
041Educational services, namely, conducting courses, seminars, and workshops in the field of software development through the use of an iterative and incremental framework; Educational services, namely, providing courses, seminars, and workshops in the field of process analysis and optimization through the use of an iterative and incremental frameworkACTIVE—
042Technical consulting in the field of software developmentACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 16, 2018MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 15, 2018ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 14, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 12, 2017EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 12, 2017EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 12, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 13, 2016NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 31, 2016ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED—
Aug 19, 2016ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Aug 16, 2016NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Aug 16, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 27, 2016NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jul 11, 2016PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 5, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 1, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 1, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 20, 2016ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 14, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 14, 2015GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 14, 2015GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 14, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 10, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 1, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 31, 2015NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance