USPTO serial 86740291
RUDOLPH'S REVENGE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 605
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- NELSON, EDWARD
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with RUDOLPH'S REVENGE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Anthony M. Brichta
ANTHONY M. BRICHTA BUCKLEY BRION LLPSTE 300118 W MARKET STWEST CHESTER, PA 19382Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | Beer | ABANDONED | Dec 1, 2010 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by IRON HILL BREWERY, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Chesapeake & Delaware Brewing Holdings, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Chesapeake & Delaware Brewing Holdings, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Similar marks named RUDOLPH'S REVENGE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 27, 2016 | MAB5 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 27, 2016 | ABN5 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 22, 2016 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 24, 2016 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 3, 2016 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jan 26, 2016 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2016 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 6, 2016 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 21, 2015 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 14, 2015 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 4, 2015 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 4, 2015 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2015 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2015 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 20, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 19, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 19, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 16, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 16, 2015 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 6, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 16, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 14, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 14, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 14, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 13, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 1, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 1, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |