USPTO serial 86740869
SI MANGIA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 30, 2018
- Examiner
- JACKSON, STEVEN W
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with SI MANGIA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Plus Government fees of $650
Owner
Los Angeles, CA
Los Angeles, CA
DANIELA SCARAMUZZA PRODUCTIONS, INC
LOS ANGELES, CA
Other trademarks owned by DANIELA SCARAMUZZA PRODUCTIONS, INC
DANIELA SCARAMUZZA PRODUCTIONS, LLC
LOS ANGELES, CA
Other trademarks owned by DANIELA SCARAMUZZA PRODUCTIONS, LLC
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Providing a website featuring entertainment information in the field(s) of Italian Culture and Heritage.; Providing an Internet website portal featuring entertainment news and information specifically in the field of Italian Culture and Heritage; Providing online interviews featuring experts including authors, chefs in the field of Italian Culture and Heritage for entertainment purposes; Provision of information in the field of leisure activities, namely, learning about Italian Culture and Heritage; Provision of information in the field of recreational activities, namely, learning about Italian Culture and Heritage | ACTIVE | Aug 19, 2014 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Si Mangia Productions, L.P.
- Other trademarks owned by Si Mangia Productions, L.P.
- Other trademarks owned by DANIELA SCARAMUZZA PRODUCTIONS, INC
- Other trademarks owned by DANIELA SCARAMUZZA PRODUCTIONS, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named SI MANGIA
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 15, 2025 | PRA7 | REGISTERED - SEC. 7 REQUEST ABANDONED | — |
| Dec 13, 2024 | PRAM | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 7 | — |
| Oct 15, 2024 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 4, 2024 | PRAM | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 7 | — |
| Oct 3, 2024 | PRA8 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 | — |
| Aug 15, 2024 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 10, 2024 | WDRL | OTQR WITHDRAWAL FROM PUBLICATION | — |
| May 15, 2024 | WDRL | OTQR WITHDRAWAL FROM PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 30, 2024 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2024 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Apr 30, 2024 | XXXX | POST REGISTRATION ACTION CORRECTION | — |
| Apr 30, 2024 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 24, 2024 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 2, 2024 | ES7R | TEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 30, 2023 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jan 30, 2023 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 30, 2023 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 30, 2023 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 16, 2020 | PRA7 | REGISTERED - SEC. 7 REQUEST ABANDONED | — |
| May 10, 2018 | PRAM | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 7 | — |
| May 9, 2018 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 2, 2018 | ES7R | TEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| May 2, 2018 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 30, 2018 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 27, 2017 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 26, 2017 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 14, 2017 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 13, 2017 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 13, 2017 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 9, 2017 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 8, 2017 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 8, 2017 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Dec 8, 2017 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 8, 2017 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 8, 2017 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Dec 4, 2017 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 4, 2017 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 8, 2017 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Nov 3, 2017 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 19, 2017 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 19, 2017 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 12, 2017 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2017 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 25, 2017 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 25, 2017 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jul 25, 2017 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 25, 2017 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 5, 2017 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 5, 2017 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 3, 2017 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 31, 2017 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2017 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 29, 2017 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 5, 2017 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2017 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jan 5, 2017 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 5, 2017 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 5, 2016 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 5, 2016 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 3, 2016 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 3, 2016 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 8, 2016 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2016 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 17, 2016 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 2, 2016 | FIXD | ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 29, 2016 | ERRR | ON HOLD - ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Dec 31, 2015 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 22, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 21, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 21, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 18, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 18, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 18, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 18, 2015 | RFTP | REMOVED FROM TEAS PLUS | — |
| Dec 11, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 1, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 1, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |