USPTO serial 86742373
VÈRIDIQUES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BLACK, MILDRED ELIZABETH
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with VÈRIDIQUES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
S. Brandon Owen
S. BRANDON OWEN Ray Quinney & Nebeker36 S State St Ste 1400Salt Lake City, UT 84111-1451UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Cosmetics; Non-medicated cleansers for personal use, namely, skin cleansers; Beauty creams; Beauty creams for body care; Face and body beauty creams; Eye cream; mascara; Eye shadow; Eyeliner; Pre-moistened cosmetic wipes; Wipes impregnated with a skin cleanser; concealers for skin, face and body; Blusher; Cosmetic skin bronzer; Skin bronzer; Make-up foundation; make-up foundation in the form of a cream; powdered make-up foundation make-up blotters, namely, cosmetic facial blotting paper; make-up primers; lip primer; Make-up remover; eye make-up remover; Make-up removers in the forms of cloths and wipes impregnated with make-up removing preparations; Make-up removers in the form of liquid; Cosmetic face wash; Face and body creams; Exfoliant creams; Beauty masks; cosmetic masks; skin masks; makeup brush cleanser; Lip gloss; lip gloss palette; Lipstick; Lip liner; Lip cream; Lip balm; non-medicated balms for use on lips; Nail polish; nail polish base coat; nail polish primer; nail polish top coat; nail polish cured with ultra-violet light; Nail polish removers; Nail polish remover wipes; Nail cream; nail gel; hand cream; beauty gels; cosmetic hand creams; Face and body lotions; Nail and cuticle oil; Nail polish pens; nail polish remover pens, namely, nail polish pens with felt and brush tips; nail polish remover pens; Cosmetic oils; Shampoos; hair shampoos and conditioners; leave-in hair conditioner; Hair care products, namely, gel, cream, pastes, sprays, deep conditioning products and protein treatment products; Anti-frizz hair care products, namely, oil and aerosol treatments; Hairspray; contour make-up kits comprised of foundation palettes; non-medicated lip plumping enhancer preparations; Cuticle remover, namely, cuticle removing preparations; Facial washes or facial cleansers | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | Printed teaching materials in the field of cosmetics | ACTIVE | — |
| 018 | Cosmetic palette cases sold empty; Cosmetic bags sold empty; make up brush cases sold empty | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | Make-up blenders, namely, foam, brushes and sponges used for applying make-up; Cosmetic brushes; Hair brushes; Handheld, rotating cosmetic brush; Handheld, rotating exfoliating and cleaning cosmetic brush | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Online retail store services featuring cosmetics | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Veridique, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Veridique, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 018
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named VÈRIDIQUES
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 31, 2018 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 31, 2018 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 31, 2018 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| May 29, 2018 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 29, 2018 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 29, 2018 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 28, 2017 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 3, 2017 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2017 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 13, 2017 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 22, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 3, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 3, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 3, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 3, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 3, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 3, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 2, 2017 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 2, 2017 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 2, 2017 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 2, 2017 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 5, 2016 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jul 5, 2016 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jul 5, 2016 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jun 9, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 8, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 8, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 8, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 8, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 8, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 1, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 1, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 3, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |