USPTO serial 86742445
Serial No. 86742445
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 27, 2018
- Examiner
- HARDY LUDLOW, TARAH KIM
- Law office
- Historical data usage
What this means
Status 702 means the registration is active, Section 8 was accepted, and a Section 15 declaration of incontestability was also accepted. Incontestability strengthens your rights by limiting certain challenges after five years of continuous use. Continue use in commerce and plan for the 10-year Section 8 and 9 renewal.
Need help with Serial No. 86742445?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Pittsburgh, PA, US
Pittsburgh, PA, US
SCHAUMBURG, IL, US
INFORMATION SYSTEMS AUDIT AND CONTROL ASSOCIATION, INC.
SCHAUMBURG, IL, US
Other trademarks owned by INFORMATION SYSTEMS AUDIT AND CONTROL ASSOCIATION, INC.
PITTSBURGH, PA, US
PITTSBURGH, PA, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Barry Horwitz
Barry Horwitz GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP77 W. Wacker DriveSuite 3100Chicago, IL 60601Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable electronic publications in the nature of instructional manuals and books that provide frameworks and best practices for optimizing processes in the field of organizational capability and performance improvement | ACTIVE | May 5, 2014 |
| 035 | Business services in the field of organizational management and performance, namely, providing business and organizational business appraisals, business management assessments, business gap analyses, and business consulting to corporations, non-profit organizations and governments through the use of analytical and statistical models defining best practices relating to improving capabilities across core process and important functional areas within an enterprise, and best practices to deliver quality and high performance, namely, in the areas of project and work management, process management, supplier management, supporting infrastructure, product engineering and development, people management, service delivery and management, and data management; business services, namely, formulation of best practices for achieving alignment on strategy, implementing governance mechanisms, managing operational components, defining dependencies, ensuring data quality and integrating data into business processes; business services, namely, formulation of best practices for organizations to use to assess themselves and upgrade their management of data as a strategic asset; business services in the field of organizational management and performance, namely, providing assessment services to corporations, non-profit organizations and governments in the nature of business evaluation to determine their key capabilities to deliver high quality and performance mission critical systems, products and services | ACTIVE | May 5, 2014 |
| 041 | Educational services, namely, providing training for corporations, non-profit organizations and governmental organizations in the field of best practices relating to data management across core process and important functional areas within an enterprise; educational services, namely, providing training for corporations, non-profit organizations and governmental organizations in the field of capability improvement to deliver quality and high performance, namely, in the areas of project and work management, process management, supplier management, supporting infrastructure, product engineering and development, people management, service delivery and management, and data management | ACTIVE | May 5, 2014 |
| 042 | Testing, analysis and evaluation of the services of corporations, non-profit organizations and governments in the field of best practices relating to capability improvement across core process and important functional areas within an enterprise to deliver quality and high performance, namely, in the areas of project and work management, process management, supplier management, supporting infrastructure, product engineering and development, people management, service delivery and management, and data management to determine conformity with certification standards | ACTIVE | May 5, 2014 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ClearModel LLC
- Other trademarks owned by ClearModel LLC
- Other trademarks owned by CMMI INSTITUTE, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by INFORMATION SYSTEMS AUDIT AND CONTROL ASSOCIATION, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by CMMI INSTITUTE, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by CMMI INSTITUTE, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 22, 2026 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jun 24, 2026 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Aug 31, 2025 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 31, 2025 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Aug 27, 2025 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 11, 2025 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 27, 2023 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| May 13, 2020 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Nov 27, 2018 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 24, 2018 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 23, 2018 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 23, 2018 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 23, 2018 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 26, 2018 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 26, 2018 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Aug 1, 2018 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Mar 28, 2018 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 26, 2018 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 26, 2018 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 26, 2018 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 27, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 26, 2017 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 1, 2017 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2017 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 12, 2017 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 21, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 21, 2017 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 21, 2017 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 21, 2017 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 21, 2017 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 20, 2017 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2017 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 20, 2017 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 23, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 23, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 16, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 1, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 8, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 8, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 8, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 13, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 13, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 13, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 7, 2016 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 7, 2016 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 6, 2016 | GAUN | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 6, 2016 | GAUD | NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 6, 2016 | NAUD | REPORT UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 15, 2016 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 15, 2016 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 15, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 15, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 15, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 21, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 21, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 21, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 14, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 4, 2015 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 3, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 3, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |